Unique particulars

Following on from this question... Is everything (according to Buddhism etc etc) that is empirically adequate a "unique particular". If we found something "empirically adequate" that could not be expressed in those terms, then would it make Buddhism pure myth etc.? And if not, we can pick and choose doctrine or at least not always take it on face value, how would you reconcile it with Buddhist doctrine. I'm not asking about practice, but philosophy :) Thanks !