Does MN9 imply a cyclic causation? How does it work?

The Nanamoli and Bodhi translation of MN9 states in 2 excerpts: > With the arising of the taints there is the arising of ignorance. With > the cessation of the taints there is the cessation of ignorance. ..... > > With the arising of ignorance there is the arising of the taints. > With the cessation of ignorance there is the cessation of the taints. The same 2 excerpts from the Thanissaro translation of MN9 reads: > From the origination of fermentation comes the origination of > ignorance. From the cessation of fermentation comes the cessation of > ignorance. ..... > > From the origination of ignorance comes the origination of > fermentation. From the cessation of ignorance comes the cessation of > fermentation. When I took a look at the Pali version of Sammaditthi Sutta (MN9) , I'm guessing that these phrases refer to: > Āsavasamudayā avijjāsamudayo, āsavanirodhā avijjānirodho ..... > > Avijjāsamudayā āsavasamudayo, avijjānirodhā āsavanirodho How does this logic work? When A arises, B arises. When A ceases, B ceases. When B arises, A arises. When B ceases, A ceases. Does this imply a cyclic causation (similar to chicken and egg)? Why is this the case? How does it work? How can the cycle be broken?