Is there any denomination or prominent theologian who mixes Dispensational and Lutheran theology?

In many ways, Dispensational and Lutheran theology are opposite to one another. For instance, Lutherans tend to revere church history while dispensationalists tend to disparage it; dispensationalists clearly divide the spiritual and physical, while Lutherans see them overlap in the sacraments, etc. So my question might seem absurd on the face of it. However, I have noticed one interesting similarity: in discussions with other Protestants, both groups commonly make as a core point to their argument the accusation that their opponent is not sufficiently *literal* in their interpretation of Scripture. For Dispensationalists, their main difference with other Christians is in their interpretation of the prophecies and covenants in the Bible. They take the prophecies and covenant promises literally and accuse others of unnecessarily spiritualizing. For Lutherans, their main difference from other Protestants is in their understanding of the Sacraments. They take what the Bible says about Baptism and Communion literally, while accusing other Christians of unnecessarily spiritualizing. **The similarity in the kind of argument is striking to me, which is why I'm curious if anyone holds to a Dispensational interpretation of prophecy but a Lutheran interpretation of Sacraments.** I haven't heard of it, but it seems like someone who really sticks to their guns on the "we must take all things literally" might have no other choice. Of course, this kind of argument is fairly run-of-the-mill in Christian disagreements, but it's orders of magnitude more common in these two contexts. I have not seen it so heavily used for any other distinctive opinion, except Young Earth Creationism, and I already know there's a lot of YEC in both Dispensationalism and in Lutheranism. (And to be perfectly clear, I'm not asking whether Lutherans or Dispensationalists are correct on either issue.)