Why did Yamaka have wrong view in SN 22.85?

In Yamaka Sutta, this was wrong view: > *As I understand the Teaching explained by the Blessed One, a monk with no more (mental) effluents, on the break-up of the body, is > annihilated, perishes & does not exist after death.* In Yamaka Sutta, this was right view: > *Then, friend Yamaka, how would you answer if you are thus asked: A monk, a worthy one, with no more mental effluents: what is he on the > break-up of the body, after death?* > > *Form is inconstant... Feeling... Perception... Fabrications... Consciousness is inconstant. That which is inconstant is > unsatisfactory (dukkha). That which is unsatisfactory has ceased and > gone to its end.* Most Buddhists believe an arahant has ended the cycle of reincarnations. If so, what made the view of Yamaka wrong view? Also, what makes the right view here right view?