Ultimate existence and the self in Mahayana

I was reading the SEP article on the two truths According to the abhidharmakosa: > An entity, the cognition of which does not arise when it is destroyed > and, mentally divided, is conventionally existent like a pot and > water. Ultimate existence is otherwise The article adds that: > For a thing to be ultimately real is for that thing to be > “foundationally existent” (dravya-sat / rdzas yod) Does any Buddhist school claim that what arises when it is divided or destroyed, whether or not that exists etc., is the self?