I have been thinking on the notion of desiring to have no desire. The idea of striving to not grasp, therefore grasping onto the idea in the first place and rendering it a contradiction and inevitably a failure(?). Is this simply the Great Paradox of Buddhism? Of life? Is it better to act through impartial/passive acceptance of things, and does this come from longterm, present and active striving to 'abolish' desire, or from gradual, passive acceptance of the self to be translated into a lack of desire? Or do the two intermingle?
Also, do these different courses of action depend on the specific sect of Buddhism?
This may be way too simple, or way too complicated.
I'm sorry if I'm not translating my thoughts too well.
Asked by Ben
(31 rep)
Oct 1, 2015, 09:14 PM
Last activity: Oct 2, 2015, 09:24 AM
Last activity: Oct 2, 2015, 09:24 AM